ELECTRONIC MAGAZINE
|
SECTION 4: ME AND HUMANITY |
|
by Milford A. Sutherland (1914-1998)
I begin with my love -- for life - for people.
Beginning with myself -
The category of myself does not exist alone
Only as a living part of others -
Only with a vision of great victories ahead -
But why begin with myself, and why return?
Because it is not enough for me to lose myself in the general.
That precious stuff - time - is mine for the moment.
Given to me not only by my mother and father -
For this moment I help carry that glorious banner, humanity.
For this reason I begin with myself and return to myself.
For me not to let that banner drop or fall!
For me to carry it forward and lift it higher.
No one entirely loses himself
-
The living fabric of mankind can be torn by each
For me there must be no hole left when I pass away.
There must be no regrets
No September song
Instead a May Day Song
*********************************
On the occasion of the author's death, |
| WOMEN, IPRA AND THE MEDIA |
|
Dear Ada,
I would like to congratulate you on the success of
It is so important that you and others continue in this work,
especially at this moment when isolated terrorist attacks put
the whole peace process in danger. The people have to take part in
It is also of utmost importance for women to play a part in these peace processes as not only do we, as women, have a different perspective to offer, but also to ensure an equal participation in society in both times of war and times of peace.
I congratulate you once more for your excellent work which will
surely bring us one step closer to achieving the resolution of
To Professor Ursula Oswald Spring Dear Ursula, Many thanks for your warm and encouraging words on our 20 Years BRIDGE SYMPOSIUM. I would like to share with you one of our major drawbacks in our peace work in general, and in our peace work through women in particular. We worked very hard on preparing the "20 YEARS TO THE BRIDGE SYMPOSIUM", and invited all the media to cover it, so as to spread the climate and hope of peace to the wide public that are so fearful and discouraged nowadays, in both the Jewish and Arab/ Palestinian sectors. However no media came! 230 Jewish and Arab/Palestinian women have a Symposium on "Peace in the Middle East," and it is not considered "news" ! My question is, why do the media consider only violence as news? How do we bring to the media that something new concerning peace is ALSO NEWS! Can IPRA do something about this, to change the priorities and attitudes of CNN, ABC, NBC, newspapers, radio broadcasts, etc? It is the same all over the world, and it is one of our major drawbacks with our wonderful IPRA peace research work and conferences. How can we at THE BRIDGE and at IPRA make a greater impact, and bring our peace research and peace values to the "unconvinced" and the "sceptic" governments around the world, as well as to the wide public? How can we build the climate and culture of peace toward a new millenium beyond war, if we do not get the necessary exposure, backing, and help from the media, and people who are in key positions (governments, councils,etc.) and agree with us? This is a crucial question which we should thoroughly discuss as part of our preparations toward our Tampere (Finland), IPRA Council in year 2000, as well as to the "International Congress on Conflict Resolution Through Culture and Literature," in the Galilee, Israel (June 1999), which I hope you and all my friends at IPRA will attend. I hope to see you all soon at the "Hague Appeal Conference" (May 1999).
Ursula Oswald Spring responded: Dear Ada, Thank you for your letter which I received today. It is indeed incredible that such a historical event as the 20 YEARS TO THE BRIDGE SYMPOSIUM, having 230 Jewish and Palestinian women together in the same room discussing peace, was not considered "newsworthy" whereas violence and death are always considered worth reporting. Surely this tells us something about the values of the societies in which we live. It seems that every day there are more programmes and films glorifying violence, especially reports of real-life incidents of violence where crimes are re-enacted for TV viewers. The popularity of such programmes (without mentioning the Hollywood blockbusters in which one man single-handedly kills thousands of people) is surely worrying. Unfortunately, we know that the violence which exists in the world in general, and in war-zones in particular, is anything but fantasy, that the bodies and the suffering are all too real.... which makes us all feel useless facing so much violence, so much death, so much desperation. Covering an event like the 20 YEARS TO THE BRIDGE SYMPOSIUM, however, could give us all hope. Just seeing this amount of Jewish and Palestinian women together, talking about peace, tells the world that there is hope. Nevertheless, as you pointed out, women discussing peace does not make "good news" and this is an extremely sad reflection of the values of our society, based on masculine values which dismiss women's ability to do anything serious and assume that nobody (meaning the masculine half of the population) would be interested in an event where women and peace were the main themes. For these reasons I think that we have our work cut out in trying to change the values of a whole society, to make the major TV companies, newspapers, radio stations etc. change their mind on what constitutes a good piece of news reporting. I definitely think it is something that we at IPRA, as an organisation, must discuss and take action, and that we, as women, must make an extra-special effort to change this situation as it is always left to us to defend our interests and rights. I believe that it is therefore imperative to prepare something solid for Tampere 2000 to make this point very clear, that peace is often not considered newsworthy whereas terrorism is. It is something which we have to work on as an organisation to improve our profile and that of peace research in general. It is also something to bear in mind during the preparatives for the Conference 2000 to work out strategies to initiate the "unconvinced" and the "sceptics" as you say , and to make the message clear that the future is peace, and that this is the most important news that could ever be broadcast, that we must reach the population in general with this most important message in order that in the future other events like the 20 YEARS TO THE BRIDGE SYMPOSIUM, are not ignored, but rather considered top-priority news.
|
|
The following is the text of a letter addressed to Chairman Arafat in response to his visit to the Anne Frank Memorial:
Your visit to the Anne Frank Memorial was a courageous
Many substantive deeds on both sides are required to make
Sincerely,
Ami Isseroff, Israel: ami_iss@netvision.net.il |
|
by Wislawa Szymborska
See how efficient it still is,
It's not like other feelings.
One religion or another -
Oh these other feelings,
Gifted, diligent, hard-working.
Let's face it:
Hatred is a master of contrast -
It's always ready for new challenges. |
|
TIME TO ABOLISH WAR PEACE IS A HUMAN RIGHT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our Ban-War Campaign and Petition appearing further below,
was modelled on the
the UN Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace
(Resolution 39/11):
adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on
November 12, 1984.
The General Assembly ...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The International Ban-War |
| Name | Address | Signature | Date | |
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
PLEASE SIGN, POST AND CIRCULATE THIS PETITION AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE.. IT WILL GIVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HUMANKIND TO VOICE THEIR ABHORRENCE OF WAR. WAR IS NOT DEMOCRATIC, AS MOST OF THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD DO NOT WANT WARS. THE WHOLE CONCEPT AND PRACTICE OF WAR SHOULD BE MADE ANACHRONISTIC IN THE THIRD MILLENIUM. THIS PETITION WILL HELP IN THROWING THE CONCEPT AND PRACTICE OF WARS IN THE DUSTBIN OF HISTORY, WHERE IT BELONGS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR MUCH NEEDED HELP AND INVOLVEMENT, IFLAC
The worst waste of resources in the world is the vast
sums that governments spend maintaining an ability to destroy all people on Earth. Less than a
quarter of those immense sums of money, if spent on promoting a global peace culture could pave
a world beyond war toward the new millenium.
Citizens of our global village, including leaders from throughout the world have
signed the BAN-WAR PETITION.
This PAVE PEACE Petition is a major step forward for Abolition of War 2000. It is a citizens'
campaign for a treaty by year 2000 for the total elimination of war by state against state, or
by part of a nation against another one.
The BAN-WAR PETITION has been translated into 21 languages, including Hebrew, French,
Arabic, Korean, Chinese, Russian, Spanish and Greek.
Related campaign:
IFOR and the UN suggest Year 2000 to 2010 for the building of a world
of non violence. HORIZON acclaims their decision and efforts,
but adds a query: WHY NOT START NOW? If we give all our impetus to the building of a global peace culture starting 1999,
perhaps we can BAN WAR by the year 2000. This is one of the
major goals of HORIZON: PAVE PEACE. Please refer to our
BAN-WAR CAMPAIGN above and sign our BAN-WAR PETITION.
The UN Decade for a Culture of Non-Violence
campaign was launched on July 1, 1997 by 20 Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, IFOR, Partage
avec les Enfants du Monde/Share with the Children of the World, and other organizations.
Their goal is to have the governments of all of the world countries at the United Nations to
adopt a resolution declaring:
1. The year 2000 "Year of Education for Non-Violence"
2. The years 2000 to 2010 "Decade for a Culture of Non-Violence"
There is only one way to fight violence with nonviolence: education.
"Our mentality is archaic. Often we continue to raise our children using ideas developed in times of war and conquest. We need to reject these outmoded principles and teach children that the 'other' is not the enemy. We must dare to tell young people, even in history classes, that they will contribute more to the world by living in dignity than by dying heroically, that it is conscience, rather than obedience, which is the basis of human life."
The Fellowship of Reconciliation urges people around the world to join in this traditional World Peace Prayer each day for one minute at midday, thus forming a continuous chain to encircle the earth.
Jan Slakov has given us the prayer in English and Spanish, and a phonetic version of the Arabic [Jan also has the prayer in Hebrew] follow below.
WORLD PEACE PRAYER
Lead me from death to life
Spanish:
Arabic:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Lead me from despair to hope
Lead me from hate to love
Let peace fill our heart, our world,
Oracion por la paz
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Llevame de la muerte a la vida
Llevame de la desesperacion a la esperanza
Llevame del odio al amor
Permite que la paz llene nuestro corazon,
SAlawat elsalAM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
koedny meen elMOWT
ila elHAYat
wamin elKEd(th)ip ila elhaKEEkah
koedny min elyaess
ila elAmel
wamin elKOWF ila elAmann
koedny min elKOORH ila elHOB
wamin elKARB ila elsaLAM
DAa elsaLAM yamla koelooBAna
waA LAmeena, walKOWN min HOWlina
|
BLOOD RED SKIES (Haifa Sunset) by Amr El Zant (Cairo, Egypt) Dr. Amr El Zant is one of the founders of the Peace Movement in Egypt. He is an astro-physicist who researches faraway galaxies, and is at present, the first Egyptian lecturer at the Haifa Technion: Israel's Institute of Technology.
Captured by the sunset from a Haifa Hill
Suddenly rising from the hills beyond
Future can only be an escape from the past
But we have fought for centuries,
We have bought the concept and now you say:
But in the Haifa night their cries go unheard |